Freedom And Freedom Of Speech Essay - 2518 Words

Many people come to the United States looking for freedom and liberty and where their essential rights are protected under the Constitution. However, freedom should not be taken for granted as for every rule there may be limits. The First Amendment of the United States’ Constitution states that â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances† (Corwin 48). In other words, the First Amendment granted freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly, and petition. The First Amendment is clear enough for anyone to comprehend and process easily; however, people sometimes misunderstand their rights by doing what their First Amendment right does not protect, especially when it comes to freedom of speech. Seven of the most important law cases in t he United States’ history are what shaped the American’s society and allowed people to hopefully know and recognize their limits and restrictions when it comes to their speech whether it was a literal speech or a symbolic speech. Primarily, in the case Schenck v. the United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), the issue was whether the First Amendment would be violated when Congress made a law that conflicted with dissent in wartime. â€Å"A unanimous court upheld the conviction of a man [named Charles Schenck] who had used theShow MoreRelatedFreedom : Freedom Of Speech And Freedom Of Speech1167 Words   |  5 Pagesdetermining how much freedom the citizens in a society has. Throughout history we have seen many different type of governments that include North Koreas’ dictatorship to the United States that has a government based on principles of democracy. In societies that have democratic governments such as the United States, England, France, and many other western European countries, the citizens have a high degree of freedom of speech. In addition, these people are allowed to have a high degree of freedom of thoughtRead MoreFreedom Of Speech : The Freedoms Of Freedom Of Speech937 Words   |  4 PagesFree dom of speech now a day’s means being able to have the right to express one’s own opinions without restraint. The United States of America is an open country for any U.S. citizen to be free to say what one would like. By citizens having freedom of speech, it gives the people the right to use hate speech. Freedom of speech belongs to every person in the United States. Here lately citizens are witnessing the rising concerns with hate speech. Unfortunately, hate speech is protected by freedomRead MoreFreedom And Freedom Of Speech2989 Words   |  12 PagesFreedom of speech is one of the cornerstones of a democratic government and has been one of the most important rights since the concept of democracy was established. The most common definition of freedom is the right to think, act, or speak as you wish without being restrained by anyone or thing. The statement above is a very general definition of freedom but that is not what is portrayed in the constitution today in respect to the rights and freedoms of individuals. In today’s world, the word â€Å"freedom†Read MoreFreedom Of Speech : The Power Of Freedom Of Speech1860 Words   |  8 Pages Freedom of speech would be easy if words did not have power. Guaranteeing people, the right to say and print whatever they want ed would be easy if we could believe that words had no real effect. But unfortunately, Americans tend to believe that words do have power and that they can anger and inspire, cause people to rise up and act out in harmful ways. Americans celebrate speakers like James Otis, Abraham Lincoln, and Martin Luther King, Jr., whose words inspired people to fight for independenceRead MoreThe Freedom Of Hate Speech Is Not Freedom Speech1143 Words   |  5 PagesHate Speech is not Freedom Speech Between August 11th and August 12th of 2017, the world watched the disturbance news of what was going on in Charlottesville, Virginia. The horrific videos and images left the world in shock. Groups of white supremacy, nationalists, hitler youths marched in unison screaming, â€Å"White lives matter! Blood and Soils! You will not replace us! Jews will not replace us!† More groups enraged their voices across Virginia to scream hate speech to other races. They threatenedRead MoreFreedom Of Speech : The Importance Of The Freedom Of Speech1039 Words   |  5 PagesFreedom of speech is a right protected by the First Amendment. According to the administrative office of the United States Courts (n.d.), the First Amendment states that, â€Å"Congress shall make no law... abridging freedom of speech.† Freedom of speech is arguably one of the most cherished American values in the First Amendment. As defined by an online unabridged Dictionary (n.d.), The rights covered by free dom of speech include the right to express opinions publicly without governmental interferenceRead MoreReligious Freedom And Freedom Of Speech1186 Words   |  5 PagesReligious freedom and freedom of speech have been enshrined in American law since the late 18th century. Both are found in the First Amendment to the US Constitution and have been at the center of some of the most important Supreme Court cases in history. From Texas v. Johnson to Lemon v. Kurtzmann, religious freedom and freedom of speech have shaped discourse more so than any other fundamental rights in America. Yet now more so than ever, the issue of religious belief versus freedom of speech has permeatedRead MoreFreedom Of The Media And Freedom Of Speech1540 Words   |  7 Pageswhen Socrates was forced to drink poison for his â€Å"corruption of youth† (Mette), which can be seen as silencing one man for the betterment of everyone, but there is always an ample amount of opinions on such a controversial top ic as Freedom of the press, or Freedom of Speech. Many nations today believe that very strict and regulated system of governing the media and entertainment is the best answer, such as China, where â€Å"censorship was considered a legitimate instrument for regulating the moral and politicalRead MoreFreedom of Speech1252 Words   |  5 Pagescorrelate with the freedom of speech. At what point does one’s words, written or spoken, become inappropriate? Should Americans be held accountable for the things that they might say or write? Should there be consequences for publishing or broadcasting information that is not correct? How are Americans suppose to differentiate what should and should not be deemed common knowledge, or privileged information? These issues are an important aspect of being American. When examining freedom of speech, AmericansRead MoreThe Freedom Of Speech833 Words   |  4 Pagesridiculed Boyer supports freedom of speech, Kaepernick’s opinion and uni ty. There are those who are saying that Boyer is disrespecting our nation during the national anthem and un-American but that’s simply not true. He chooses to stand during the national anthem which is tradition. Boyer states that although he might not agree with Kaepernick he supports his opinion. He’s supporting the right to free speech and peaceful protest, something this nation was founded on. Freedom of speech is an inalienable

The Function Of The Cardiac Adipose Stem Cells Essay

duration of time, the cardiac adipose stem cells still exhibited the cardiovascular cell markers. In the mouse model, these cells displayed the highest rate of cardiac function improvement 6. Of specific importance in relation to stem cell therapy is the ability to regenerate cardiac tissues. In 2012, the first successful transplantation of stem cells into multiple patients contending with a myocardial infarction was successful. The damaged tissues exhibited regrowth in the patients. In the control group of the experiment, no regrowth was shown and the damaged tissue remained the same 7. Heart problems contribute to a large amount of deaths in the world. The largest problem is congestive heart failure caused by heart attack or diseases involving the heart valves. Many efforts have been directed to prevent some deaths by generating stem cells that can integrate into cardiomyocytes or other regenerative cells that can be implicated in the heart and surrounding vessels. Experimental procedures have been tested via animal models in order to determine the ability of the cells to regenerate. Most typical of experiments is the use of mice and the embryonic stem cells researchers can obtain from them. However, a significant study showed that human embryonic cardiomyocytes could be introduced into guinea pigs and would begin a beat if the myocardium was electrophysiologically silenced and incapable of acting as the pacemaker of the heart. In some studies, animals were purposefullyShow MoreRelatedLab Report - Plant and Animal Tissues2567 Words   |  11 Pages · Cross section of the stem of Cucurbita sp.  · Cross section of the stem of Helianthus  · Cross section of Zea mays stem Animal Tissues  · A section of the ciliated epithelium (frog’s small intestine, frog’s ciliated epithelium, cheek cells  · Blood smear  · Slide of an adipose tissue  · Slide containing a hyaline cartilage and elastic cartilage  · Cross section of bone  · Prepared slide of skeletal, smooth, and cardiac muscle  · Nerve cell smear  · Microscope Read MorePlasticity Of Mesenchymal Stem Cell3461 Words   |  14 PagesPLASTICITY OF MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL INTRODUCTION Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), also regarded as marrow stromal cells, are multipotent adult stem cells that are able to differentiate into limited mesodermal lineage and are able to self renew. MSCs possess characteristics that make them useful in regenerative medicine including, immunomodulation, secretion profile and homing characteristics. Depending on where they are used, these characteristics can have a positive and negative influence on the diseaseRead MoreObesity And The United States Healthcare System939 Words   |  4 Pagesheart pumps, the muscles of the heart go through cycles of contraction and relaxation. The force generated by the cardiac muscle propels the required volume of oxygenated blood through the body to the organs which require it. Also associated with obesity is the buildup of plaque on arterial walls due to low-density lipoprotein levels in the blood. Diabetes is a condition that stems from the inadequate breakdown of sugar or the bodies inability to breakdown the sugars consumed in food. The bodyRead MoreThe Importance Of Homeostasis And A State Of Equilibrium Reached Through Physiological Processes1169 Words   |  5 Pagesliving things use cells, tissues, organs, and organ systems to counteract physical changes. Using a variety of different tissues, organs are formed to accomplish specific tasks. The four main types of tissues are epithelial tissue, connective tissue, muscular tissue, and nervous tissue. Several sublevels exist for each type of tissue. Epithelial tissue covers body surfaces and lines body cavities. The three main kinds of Epithelial tissue are squamous which is composed of flat cells, cuboidal, whichRead MoreMSC Case Study1701 Words   |  7 PagesBM-MSCs rescued the mouse. Also, Kim et al. (2007) reported that systemic transplantation of human adipose SCs attenuated cerebral inflammation and degeneration in a hemorrhagic stroke model. In addition, Nagaya et al. (2004) mentioned that I.V. administration of MSCs improved cardiac function in rats with acute myocardial infarction. The MSCs differentiated into cardiomyocytes and vascular endothelial cells, resulting in myogenesis and angiogenesis. The testes of rats in the I.T. treated AT-MSCs eitherRead MoreYess1930 Words   |  8 Pagesorder to function properly, the cells and tissues have to maintain a steady state (homeostasis)- the cells must constantly adapt cellular adaptation- is the state between a normal unstressed cell and the overstressed injured cell -by definition - an adaptative process is reversible -within defined limits, all the cells are capable of adapting to a variety of stimuli which may upset normality NORMAL CELL GROWTH -Normal tissue growth depends on a balance between the number of cells activelyRead MoreScsd1374 Words   |  6 PagesCell Theory Cell Theory  is a way to describe the  biology  of  living things. Cell theory says that the  cell  is the basic unit of life. Cells by themselves are alive, but they can also be part of a larger living thing. The smallest living  organisms  (like  bacteria  but not  viruses) and the biggest ones (like  humans  and  whales) are all made of cells. Very small organisms like bacteria and  amoebas  are only made of one cell each, so they are called  unicellular organisms  (uni means one). Larger organismsRead Morechapter 42050 Words   |  9 Pagesthe alveolus (air sac) in the lung is composed of which type of epithelium? simple squamous epithelium Yes, this single layer of squamous cells is ideal for the diffusion of gases in the lungs. 1) The proximal tubule of the nephron (kidney tubule) in the kidney is composed of which type of epithelium? simple cuboidal epithelium Yes, the simple cuboidal cells line the kidney tubules (nephrons) so that secretion and absorption can take place. 2) The epithelium of the esophagus is composed of whichRead MoreMedical Ethics : Adult Stem Cell Research Essay1565 Words   |  7 Pages Tennisa Saunders Medical Ethics Adult Stem Cell Research Professor December 2016 In this essay I decided to write on Stem. Initially, I began by defining what stem cell is and the different types of stem cell scientist work with. I include the medical scenario of a woman from Huston by the name of Debbie Bertrand who suffered from Multiple Sclerosis. I also included Dr. Lall, discovery of stem cells in baby teeth, because I found the article to be very interesting. Philosophical questionRead MoreLevel 3 Health and Social Care, Unit 5 P22943 Words   |  12 PagesUnit 5 P2 Explain what they are, their functions and where they are found. Then go into detail about two organs, with their functions, what tissues they are made of and where they are found in the body. Tissues: Tissues are groups of similar cells that have specific functions. In this piece of work I’ll talk about these types of cells: Epithelial Tissues: Epithelial are the lining of internal and external surfaces and body cavities, including tubes/channels (ducts) carrying secretions from glands

Problem with Evil Existence of God Free Essays

string(249) " It is often that the existential approach turns from asking why God would allow such evils to happen to instead how one can go to God in search for him to help relieve them of their problems and find ways to make suffering and evil more tolerable\." Today the news is filled with coverage on various natural catastrophes and other related causalities that people face daily. Anyone can look into their lives or even their neighbors and see the presence of misfortune that surrounds our world. This problem has brought up the issue of God’s existence in religious philosophical discussions. We will write a custom essay sample on Problem with Evil Existence of God or any similar topic only for you Order Now For centuries, many have tried to dismiss the existence of God on the basis of the existence of evil. Let’s consider where God has been placed in people’s lives throughout our history. For the Greeks and Romans gods were thought to personify wisdom, war, and other actions that human beings took (Spitzer 5). As knowledge continued to progress god was thought to live in heaven, beyond the realm of the planets. He was believed to have created life thousands of years ago. Soon as human knowledge progressed even further we’ve learned about the Big Bang, DNA, and evolution (Spitzer 14). It seems that the more humans know, the further back God gets pushed. Often, it appears as if humans use God as a placeholder for the unknown, but as we learn more, he gets redefined. Philosophers question whether or not there can be a wholly good God that would create such a world where evil exists. This pursuit is known as the problem of evil. â€Å"According to the ‘problem of evil’, the extent of evils in the world seems to conflict with the existence of an omniscient, omnibenevolent, and omnipotent God. Theodicy is a study where theists are able to get together and make their arguments disclosing information on the compatibility between God and evil. This seems to be one of the most perplexing problems theists have to face. In today’s world, there are many differing opinions as to whether a God exists or not. This obviously has been an issue of great controversy because many people worship different gods or no god at all. I will define theodicy; discuss the conflict between an omniscient God and the existence of evil, and touch on free will and how it plays into natural and moral evil. Theodicy is the branch of theology that defends God’s goodness and justice in the face of the existence of evil (dictionary. com). Theodicy is a term hat comes from the Greek words theos meaning God and dike meaning righteous. The basic form of theodicy involves these assumptions that God is all good and powerful therefore he is all knowing and that the universe was made by God and does it exist in a contingent relationship to God. Also the assumption of the existence of evil and why. (Mackie 150) This suggests that if God is all good and powerful he would choose to eliminate such evils. In the case of God b eing all good but not all powerful he may be unable to intervene in the evils of this world. Or if God was just all powerful and not all good one must assume he has a malicious side to him to allow all this evil. Assuming that God is all these things both powerful and good if the universe doesn’t exist in a contingent relationship to God then he has little to do with the evil. With this being said still leaves the question â€Å"why does evil exist†? The basic approaches to theodicy can be said to take three forms: logical/deductive, evidential/inductive, and existential. The logical problem of evil is a deductive one. If God is said to be all good, all powerful, and all knowing why should evil exist. Is it rational to believe in the existence of God? This is Mackie’s formulation of the problem God exists, is all good, all knowing, and all powerful. Such a being has no limits to its ability. A good being will always eliminate all the evil that it can. Evil exists, so God must not (Theodicy Overview). You can agree with the first two statements, but one might argue the third statement by making the point that a good being will always eliminate all the evil that it can unless it has good reason to allow that evil. Therefore, a modified version of Mackie’s argument looks like this: â€Å"If God exists, then there is no evil, unless there is a reason that would justify Him in permitting it. Evil exists. There is no reason that would justify God to permit evil. So, God does not exist (Theodicy Overview). † The intention behind this argument is to show that God is justified in permitting evil. The evidential problem of evil admits that God and the existence of evil are logically compatible, the concept of good and bad are known to go together. Considering the amount or various kinds of evil in the world conclude as vidence against the existence of God. This approach argues that because of the large amounts of evil in the world and the existence of unjustified evil the belief in God is not plausible. We assume that God would refuse to allow such evils to exist that fail in appearance to have any good purpose. Here are examples of these objections. â€Å"It seems that God could have eliminated more evil in the world and still accomplished the divine purposes (Matson 145). † â€Å"Is such a God who does things this way worthy of worship, and therefore, plausible (Matson 145)? With little evidence it’s hard to prove or disprove if something exists. Dealing with a being such as God we may not always be able to understand his reasoning for allowing such evils and will not always see his greater purpose for his divine moral teachings. The existential approach often referred to as the religious approach to the problem of evil is the concept of why the suffering is happening to a certain individual and why at this time or place in this individual’s life. Theodicy is now seen as practical more concerned with providing answers for those who suffer in specific circumst ances. It is often that the existential approach turns from asking why God would allow such evils to happen to instead how one can go to God in search for him to help relieve them of their problems and find ways to make suffering and evil more tolerable. The focus is on how believers should respond to God during their tribulations for example turning to faith, testimony, and worship. This is an overview on theodicy and introduces some of the main concepts that sets its foundation. Now the conflict between an omniscient God and the existence of evil seems to get very complicated. God is referred to be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent simultaneously. If God is omnipotent this means he has power over anything and everything. If God is omniscient this means he is aware of all things that occur and if he is omnibenevolent this means he is wholly good. It would seem rational to believe that an omnibenevolent God would be of nature to relieve suffering wherever it is happening (Swinburne 67). An omniscient God would know when people are suffering, how they are suffering, and how that suffering may be relieved. An omnipotent God has the power to alleviate those who are suffering from their sufferings. So why does God allow evil to exist? Maybe God allows evil to exist because it is necessary for some greater good. For example, when a parent gives a child bad tasting medicine or has the child undergo painful surgery. From the child’s perspective they would feel as if they were being punished for something or enduring a form of evil. When this isn’t the case at all the parent is only looking out for the child’s best interest (Swinburne 100). The child shows ignorance of the parent’s reasoning for forcing him/her to undergo the temporary pain and so the child finds this treatment unjust when in actuality it isn’t. Perhaps we can use the metaphor of the child’s perception of his parent’s action to God and our perception of his creation of evil. â€Å"For we cannot deny that some good the child’s mind cannot even conceive may justify the parents in permitting the child to suffer. And by analogy, won’t the same be true of God in relation to us as his children (Theodicy Overview)? † This can conclude that we are sometimes unable to see the bigger picture of God’s purpose when it comes to human suffering. God may be teaching us the secrets behind the moral code. Like what is just and in just. We are being taught moral responsibilities and moral traits to help us reach a greater good that God possibly has in store for our lives. Some still argue that this isn’t the case at all. There are still many evils that don’t necessarily seem to produce any good or help in the counter-balance between good and evil. One incident that comes to mind is the Holocaust. It was a horrific period of time in our history where genocide occurred. It is hard to believe that an all-powerful and all-knowing God would become powerless in preventing the nightmare in Auschwitz. Also if God is omnibenevolent we would ponder on the question how can he let something so malice take place on innocent lives? Is it reasonable to believe that all evils can be explained to where they occur to result in a greater good and that we are somehow unable to always make sense of why such and such thing are happening? It is possible that a massacre shooting at a school resulting in the death of many young lives may serve to promote a greater good, but it doesn’t seem likely. Now there is a distinction between the good parent and the good God. In such cases where a child is undergoing pain which they are incapable of understanding the parent is there to reassure them of their love and give them useful insight on better understanding their situation and what it is their going through. There are numerous people who go through prolonged suffering who are consciously unaware of God’s presence. Going back to the incidents that occurred in Auschwitz it is unlikely that the majority of prisoners felt God’s love and reassurance. They most likely felt abandoned and un-loved. Many would have to question where was God during this time and what type of parent does this make him. It appears that God acted like a negligent parent with a cold heart. With that being said we can make the assumption that God doesn’t exist or the good-parent analogy fails. This argument that God allows evil to exist to show us the greater good seems to be implausible due to the fact that such horrendous evils fail to show the greater good they are meant to produce. There are two basic forms of evil which are natural and moral. Natural evil is when the world experiences suffering caused by disease, earthquakes, floods, crashes, and so on. Moral evil is when someone chooses to act ill-mannered based on human will. Now natural evil can’t be prevented and is easily misunderstood to why God allows such natural disasters to occur. Where moral evil is based upon each individual and their code of ethics, how they differentiate right from wrong. Some argue that God punishes people based on their actions because we have the ability to choose what’s good and what’s bad. This is where the free-will defense can cover moral evil, but it fails to cover natural evil. It is believed that God created man to possess free-will allowing him the freedom of choice. With the freedom of choice there becomes conflict when you have to make the decision between right and wrong. The fact that we have been taught to know what is right should benefit us when it comes to making the better decision, but that isn’t always the case. Due to the various temptations we have in our society many of us continue to fall short of the moral code. If God has made men such that in their free choices they sometimes prefer what is good and sometimes what is evil, why could he not have made men such that they always freely choose the good (Mackie 164)? † It is easy to assume that such a being as God would want his creation to be wholly good like him, but this isn’t the case at all. Some argue that if God was to have created us to always freely choose good we wouldnâ €™t be entirely entitled to freedom. If we were being forced to choose one way or the other we wouldn’t be choosing freely. Without the ability to choose what is wrong we would no longer have to worry about greed, lust, violence, and other evils because they would no longer be a choice of ours. â€Å"We would be free from temptations and only have innocent inclinations, and so could not exemplify the moral value of resisting and overcoming temptations to do wrong (Mackie 165). † In conclusion, I do believe in the rationality behind the existence of God. Just because there is a problem with evil and a disagreement to why God would allow such evils to exist I feel there is a greater purpose behind Gods plan. The evils that are apparent in our society today teaches us the value of morals and the importance in having them. We are able to step outside ourselves and our heart goes out to those we see suffering from deprivation all around the world. The idea of God being omniscient, omnipotent, omnibenevolent while there is an existence of evil seems to be problematic unless you can believe in the fact that it is possible we are incapable of comprehending all it is God is trying to teach us. For God to be unwilling to remove the devastation in this world there would have to be good reasoning behind all of this. To believe in God you are exercising your ability to have faith in a higher power. You are choosing to believe in something that has yet to be proven into existence. Faith is known to be very important to God and it is through the trials and tribulations you turn your faith towards God in search of comfort and understanding. I do believe that during the hard times God waits for us to turn to him and trust in him that he has the ability to mitigate all our problems. It is necessary to experience or witness evils in the world because it is a way for us to build our faith and come into a closer connection with God. By God creating us having free-will this allows us to choose from what is good and what is evil. We are able to establish morals and learn the virtues of life. The great thing about this is that these lessons only come if we choose to learn them. It is our choice what we allow to dictate our lives. I believe if we are ever going to be able to see or comprehend what God’s divine purpose is for allowing such evils to exist we need to become more like him. Abiding by the laws of God is an option , a choice that he has left up to us. How to cite Problem with Evil Existence of God, Papers

Personality analysis - Carlos Ghosn free essay sample

1. Describe Carlos Ghosn using the â€Å"Big Five† dimensions of personality †¢ Extraversion reflects the tendency to experience positive emotional states and feel good about oneself and the world around one. His personal style is brisk and direct, but not without warmth. He takes every opportunity to communicate his vision and priority. He also goes directly to the people.He addresses the entire company on a regular basis. Everywhere he goes he makes a point to talk to Nissan employees at all levels, often in small groups. He also expends considerable effort to connect with the public. He is aware of sharing his vision with the company and make them feeling real part of it †¢ Agreeableness is the tendency to get along well with others and cooperates. Ghosn is amenable to openly debating major issues, giving everyone the possibility to discuss and present his point of view He holds a strong clarity of vision and ability to communicate throughout the organization. We will write a custom essay sample on Personality analysis Carlos Ghosn or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page His messages are straightforward, direct, and simple. His priority is clear. He believes in giving his managers precise and quantifiable objectives Motivation is his ultimate weapon. His management style is inspired by this. He is very demanding about performance, very demanding on himself, and very demanding of the people around him. His tought is:† To be able to be demanding, you have to empower people. You cant be demanding of someone who isnt empowered, it isnt fair† He is willing to listen to the critics, but without aiming to popularity at any cost †¢ Conscientiousness is related to the extent to which a person is careful, scrupulous, and preserving. Ghosn stresses action, speed, and results. He follows up closely. If there are any deviations he goes after them immediately. He is relentless in following up. Ghosn thinks the most important to produce amazing results is to show clear goals and strategy, empower people, watch the results carefully and keep an eye on the reality †¢ Emotional Stability means to be emotionally and physically predictable and not readily moved. People that are emotionally stable are able to tolerate the day to day strains and stresses by not getting emotionally upset, anxious or angry. Ghosn was able to face the day to day stress, and did well even in difficult situations: for example as when launching a three-year plan for increasing Re nault’s efficiency, in a paralyzed market and a very close minded context, facing cultural conflicts, as the French were not  willing to accept change. An other difficult situation where he demonstrated to have a strong emotional stability was as ‘cost killer’ for Nissan. He went straight to his goal, fearless about a definitely not popular task Openness to Experience: reflects the extent to which a person is original, has broad interests, and is willing to take risks. Ghosn attributes his success to the way that he works through cross- functional teams. He thinks that when people from different backgrounds work together under pressure they come up with more creative solutions . â€Å"What is different is the only way we can grow by confronting ourselves† he says He is also willing to take risks, as he demonstrate being the first executive to try to run two big carmakers at once. A very big challenge